airplane

Winging It! Implications of Trump’s Tariff Plan on US A&D

Implications of Trump’s Tariff Plans on the Commercial Aerospace and Defense Industry 

The commercial aerospace and defense industries are relatively insulated from the potential adverse effects of Trump’s tariff plans  due to several structural factors. A significant portion of the manufacturing base for these industries is located within the United  States, particularly for major players like Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon Technologies (RTX). This domestic production  reduces their exposure to import tariffs on components or raw materials that could otherwise raise costs. Additionally, the United  States Department of Defense (DoD) remains the largest and most consistent customer for defense contractors, providing a stable  revenue stream that is less sensitive to trade disruptions or tariff-related price increases. This strong dependence on domestic markets  for both defense and commercial sectors offers a degree of protection against potential economic friction triggered by global trade  policies.

However, the long-term risks associated with tariffs should not be overlooked. If tariffs were to escalate or if trade tensions persisted,  the aerospace and defense industry could experience higher costs on imported materials that are not easily sourced domestically.  Tariffs on critical components, such as rare metals or advanced electronics, could increase production expenses, especially in sectors  where specialized parts are required for advanced systems. Moreover, supply chain disruptions due to global trade barriers could  delay production schedules, particularly if the industry depends on suppliers located outside the U.S. Although the impact might be  manageable in the short term, prolonged trade uncertainty could hinder the industry’s ability to innovate or scale production,  potentially undermining long-term competitiveness.

Despite these potential risks, the aerospace and defense industries remain attractive in the long run for several key reasons. First, the  global demand for defense spending continues to rise, driven by geopolitical tensions, technological advancements, and the  modernization of military forces across the world. The U.S. military, as well as allied nations, will continue to prioritize defense  investments, particularly in areas such as cybersecurity, space exploration, advanced air defense systems, and unmanned vehicles.  This demand for advanced military technologies and systems ensures that defense companies will see consistent growth opportunities  in the years to come. Companies like Curtiss-Wright and Textron also stand to benefit from these trends, given their strong track  records in providing innovative and mission-critical technologies that support both commercial and defense applications.

In the commercial aerospace sector, the industry’s long-term prospects are also strong, underpinned by a robust recovery from the  pandemic. As air travel resumes and global demand for passenger aircraft increases, leading manufacturers like Boeing are well-positioned to capitalize on the growing need for new, fuel-efficient aircraft. Airlines around the world are continuing to modernize  their fleets, and the demand for new aircraft is expected to increase over the next two decades. Additionally, the rise of emerging  markets, particularly in Asia and Africa, will contribute to a growing demand for air travel, which will be a key driver of commercial  aerospace sales.

For companies like Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and RTX, the tariffs’ effects are likely to vary depending on their specific business  segments. Boeing, a leader in commercial aircraft manufacturing, may face some challenges from tariffs on components and raw  materials, particularly as it competes in a global market where international sales are crucial. While its manufacturing footprint in  the U.S. provides some insulation, its global supply chain and reliance on international sales could see price hikes in its aircraft  components. On the defense side, however, Boeing benefits from the steady flow of contracts from the U.S. government, which is  largely insulated from tariff concerns. Lockheed Martin and RTX, both major defense contractors, would likely experience minimal  impact from tariffs as their primary customers are the U.S. government and its allies. These companies may, however, face indirect  pressures if global trade tensions disrupt international collaboration or if tariffs increase costs on international defense contracts.  Overall, while the commercial aerospace segment could be slightly more exposed to tariff risks, the defense sector’s reliance on U.S.  government contracts provides a significant buffer against adverse long-term effects.

In summary, while tariffs may introduce short-term uncertainties and increased costs, the commercial aerospace and defense  industries remain attractive over the long term. The essential nature of defense spending, the recovery and growth of global air travel,  and the advent of groundbreaking technologies ensure a positive long-term trajectory for companies within these sectors. By  leveraging their advanced technological capabilities, strong government relationships, and market-leading positions, firms like  Boeing, Curtiss-Wright, Lockheed Martin, RTX, and Textron are poised to continue benefiting from steady demand, ensuring their  resilience against economic fluctuations. As the world continues to prioritize defense and modernize its aerospace fleets, these  industries will likely remain vital to both national security and global connectivity.

Important Disclosures 

ONE CORPORATE CENTER RYE, NY 10580 Gabelli Funds TEL (914) 921-5000  This whitepaper was prepared by Tony Bancroft and Michael Burgio. The examples cited herein are based on public information  and we make no representations regarding their accuracy or usefulness as precedent. The Research Analysts’ views are subject to  change at any time based on market and other conditions. The information in this report represent the opinions of the individual  Research Analyst’s as of the date hereof and is not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results, or  investments advice. The views expressed may differ from other Research Analysts or of the Firm as a whole.

As of December 31, 2024, affiliates of GAMCO Investors, Inc. beneficially owned 1.40% of Textron Inc., and less than 1% of all  other companies mentioned.

This whitepaper is not an offer to sell any security nor is it a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. 
Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, sales charges and expense of the fund carefully before investing.
Gabelli Funds, LLC is a registered investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is a wholly owned  subsidiary of GAMCO Investors, Inc. (OTC: GAMI).
For more information, visit our website at: www.gabelli.com or call: 800-GABELLI
800-422-3554 • 914-921-5000 • Fax 914-921-5098 • info@gabelli.com
Michael Burgio

Michael Burgio

Research Analyst
MBurgio@gabelli.com
(914) 921-7797
Tony Bancroft

Tony Bancroft

Research Analyst
tbancroft@gabelli.com
(914) 921-5083
Katie Durkin

Katie Durkin

Job Title
Email
Phone

© Gabelli Funds 2025

800-Gabelli
info@gabelli.com

Invest with Gabelli today